OS X Helper Applications
December 16, 2011

I’ve recently been looking at how to set up a helper application (one that either runs all the time as a background task, or on demand, potentially with system permissions).

Apple has a few samples in this area, but they’re not all that complete, sometimes not cocoa-centric, and I found them a bit confusing.

After a fair bit of puzzling it out I’ve created my own sample (a modified version of a couple of theirs), and I’ve put it up on github in the hope that it might help someone else. Here’s the read me file for the project:

About ECHelper

This is based on Apple’s SMJobBless example, which shows how to cleanly install a helper tool that needs to run with privileges as a launchd task.

Staying Consistent

The biggest problem with this task is that the helper tool and the host application that’s going to install it have to be set up very carefully to have the right code-signing details and bundle ids.

If you wanted to change these in the SMJobBless example you had to do it in lots of different places - and it was easy to miss one.

This sample gets round that problem by setting three user-defined values at the project level, in the Settings.xcconfig file:

HELPER_ID = com.elegantchaos.helper.helper
HOST_ID = com.elegantchaos.helper.host
HELPER_SIGNING = 3rd Party Mac Developer Application: Sam Deane

You should set HELPER_ID to the bundle id that you want to use for your helper application.

You should set HOST_ID to the bundle id that you want to use for the host application - the one that installs the helper (and which probably makes use of it, although that’s not necessarily the case).

You should set HELPER_SIGNING to the code signing profile that you want to use to sign everything. Note that if this profile is associated with a bundle id pattern (eg. com.elegantchaos.*) then the HELPER_ID and HOST_ID settings must match the pattern, otherwise xcode will refuse to sign the applications.

The name of the profile is embedded in various places, and it’s important that they all match exactly what’s in the certificate. For this reason you need to specify an exact profile name here (like “3rd Party Mac Developer Application: Sam Deane”), rather than a wildcard (like “3rd Party Mac Developer Application: *”).

Building The Plists

The tricky part of all of this is that the host application needs one plist, and the helper application two, and both of them make reference to the three values defined above.

What’s more, you can’t rely on Xcode’s variable substitution to fill in all of these values. Two of the plists are embedded in the __TEXT section of the helper application, which is a simple binary and therefore doesn’t live in a bundle. These are embedded with some special linker commands, and it appears that Xcode (and the underlying linker tools) don’t pre-process the lists in passing.

Even with the other plist (which is used for the host application) has a complication to it, because one of the special keys in it is a dictionary where a key needs to be replaced by the value of HELPER_ID. It appears that Xcode’s plist pre-processing doesn’t affect keys, only values, so you can’t use a variable in the key to fill in the correct value.

The way I’ve got round this is to add build scripts to both targets which take the original plists and perform the substitutions. The various linking stages then use the output of these scripts as their inputs.

In theory these derived plists should probably go into ${DERIVED_FILE_DIR}, so that they are hidden out of the way.

However, it seems that Xcode needs to be able to find them when the build starts, because they are set as the Info.plist to use for the targets. When I tried hiding them away in the build folder, Xcode couldn’t seem to cope, so instead I’ve added them to the project as “proper” resource files. Each time you build, they’ll be regenerated. Luckily though, Xcode (and git) don’t see them as having changed unless they actually do change (because you change the values of the variables mentioned above).

Example Helper

I’ve also expanded the example to illustrate one way to actually communicate with the helper application.

This example uses distributed objects, which is NOT a particularly secure way to do things. Assuming that your helper is running with enhanced priveleges of some sort, it obviously becomes a potential attack vector for things that are trying to take over your system. DO is big and powerful, and complicated, and thus hard to secure.

In reality you should probably use something simpler, like sending simple bytecode across a NSMachPort or NSSocketPort.

« Neu 1.2 Released OS X Code Injection »
Got a comment on this post? Let us know at @elegantchaoscom.